MLK

MLK was a mouthpiece for 'peace'. Decide for yourself if that is a good thing. But that's why he was iconned and protected. War vs Peace (absolute monarchy, militarism, nationalism, traditionalism, etc. ... VS ... constitutional monarchies/governments, World Order (anti nation-state), opened economies (mixed), international arbitration, interfaithism, universalism/brotherhood and nearly everything else you see around you today) Since Napoleonic Wars (despite all the setbacks like American Civil War) elite Anglo-American "peace" agenda (in action, ideals obviously go back further) was sold to Christian nations then increasingly sold worldwide. See those Peace Societies bloom! (wasn't peasants behind them) That's why nothing much MLK said in his Nobel lecture would concern old family liberal protestants who set off the 'ordered world of peace' agenda. It's no secret most Republicans and Democrats both support world peace/liberal international order. Two sides of same peace coin. MLK was an obedient field negro in service to Anglo-American led Empire of 'Peace'. Anglo guys speaking imperial words of peace to brown peoples of world doesn't work as well (kind of like how having sincere, *unwilling-to-deceive* Christians in likes of media doesn't help in creating the "international mind" required for World Order. Thanks Hofjuden.). MLK was a good boy, telling poorer brown nations they needed West to come in and educate them, mold them, generally selling universal fellowship, world unity. War vs Peace http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-end-of-martin-luther-king-day.html#comment-form