ILLUMINATING
HIDDEN TRUTHS
HIDDEN TRUTHS
What title do you prefer?
Courthouse Shadows
or
The Crooked Court Calendar
Courthouse Shadows
or
The Crooked Court Calendar
Does the Wisconsin Court of Appeals really have a huge backlog of cases to hear, or are members of the court selectively abusing the court calendar ?
You decide.
Most people are unaware of how courts manage the court calendar. Court calendar events can be accelerated or slowed at the whim of the judge. This power to manage the court calendar empowers the court's opportunity to sway not only the verdict before the court, it can also sway events associated directly or indirectly with the court case.
Case in Point:
Upcoming Court of Appeals elections,
April, 2020
Chief Court of Appeals judge Lisa Neubauer's term expires next year. Should Judge Neubauer decide to run for reelection, she will be on the
April, 2020 ballot.
Here is where it gets very
interesting and contemptible:
Sandy Weidner vs. City of Racine
Racine County Circuit Court case # 2107CV001644
&
Court of Appeals case # 2018AP001189
Sandy Weidner's Appeals case was ready
for court assignment over 4 months ago and it has yet to be assigned.
Why?
That may be the $100 dollar question tagged with an election held in balance.
Delaying the assignment of this highly controversial court case of national awareness
can play well for the reelection ambitions
of judge Neubauer.
When Weidner vs. City of Racine was appealed to the Court of Appeals, Judge Neubauer blindly
(or maybe something much more sinister) and illegally followed Racine County Circuit Court Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz's lead to seal the entire court record. The entire sealed court record included the names of the parties and the docketing number of the court case. The two courts were at one point simultaneously conducting illegal secret courts and engaging in criminal misconduct.
Avoiding additional negative press about these highly controversial and illegal court proceedings is an election advantage for her.
Being the public's memory is short and selective, she has a better chance of being reelected without the coverage of the press.
Judge Lisa Neubauer
The court calendar is one of many tools the judiciary can use to affect the
outcome of a court case.
By managing the court calendar you can manage the press. Manage the press and you may sway the outcome of an election.
Is it a coincidence that this case has been waiting over 4 months for judicial assignment or is Judge Neubauer abusing the court calendar ?
You Decide!
----------------------------------------------
As a government watchdog,
we work for public interest.
We poke the bear, remain the thorn
in the corrupt government's side,
the pebble in their shoe
and the squeaky wheel.
We are not politically correct,
nor do we care to be!
Reject the political poison from the
democrats and republicans.
Vote intelligently.
Case in Point:
Upcoming Court of Appeals elections,
April, 2020
Chief Court of Appeals judge Lisa Neubauer's term expires next year. Should Judge Neubauer decide to run for reelection, she will be on the
April, 2020 ballot.
Here is where it gets very
interesting and contemptible:
Sandy Weidner vs. City of Racine
Racine County Circuit Court case # 2107CV001644
&
Court of Appeals case # 2018AP001189
Sandy Weidner's Appeals case was ready
for court assignment over 4 months ago and it has yet to be assigned.
Why?
That may be the $100 dollar question tagged with an election held in balance.
Delaying the assignment of this highly controversial court case of national awareness
can play well for the reelection ambitions
of judge Neubauer.
When Weidner vs. City of Racine was appealed to the Court of Appeals, Judge Neubauer blindly
(or maybe something much more sinister) and illegally followed Racine County Circuit Court Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz's lead to seal the entire court record. The entire sealed court record included the names of the parties and the docketing number of the court case. The two courts were at one point simultaneously conducting illegal secret courts and engaging in criminal misconduct.
Avoiding additional negative press about these highly controversial and illegal court proceedings is an election advantage for her.
Being the public's memory is short and selective, she has a better chance of being reelected without the coverage of the press.
The court calendar is one of many tools the judiciary can use to affect the
outcome of a court case.
By managing the court calendar you can manage the press. Manage the press and you may sway the outcome of an election.
Is it a coincidence that this case has been waiting over 4 months for judicial assignment or is Judge Neubauer abusing the court calendar ?
You Decide!
----------------------------------------------
As a government watchdog,
we work for public interest.
We poke the bear, remain the thorn
in the corrupt government's side,
the pebble in their shoe
and the squeaky wheel.
We are not politically correct,
nor do we care to be!
Reject the political poison from the
democrats and republicans.
Vote intelligently.
Just say NO !
That's still a *MAN* - *BABY*!
ReplyDelete