Friday, July 24, 2026
Will residential customers be forced to pay for data center power lines?
Francesca Pica
As more Wisconsin utilities look to hold hyperscale data centers financially responsible for new power plants, regulators are still left to decide a key question: who's paying for the power lines?
On July 16, American Transmission Co. filed plans to shield residents from costs related to Microsoft’s multibillion-dollar data center campus on the former Foxconn site in Mount Pleasant. The power line company serves more than five million customers in eastern Wisconsin, Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and parts of Minnesota and Illinois.
It’s the first in a string of plans to directly assign data center-related transmission costs to the tech companies that own them, according to ATC. These include Vantage Data Centers’ $15 billion project in Port Washington and a data center in Beaver Dam owned by Facebook parent Meta.
ATC is planning more than $2 billion in new high-voltage power lines, substations and facility upgrades to help serve large data centers – an unprecedented build-out for the company. ATC charges these costs to utilities like We Energies, who send them to their customers through energy bills.
We Energies will pay the total cost of transmission capacity a data center requests “even in the event the end-use data center customer fails to materialize or take 100% of the requested service,” according to the proposal. Microsoft must then pay the utility back in full.
“It’s a little bit like a builder. You say, ‘I want a four-bedroom house,’ and it's like, ‘well, I'm only going to use three of them for a while and I don’t want to pay for one quarter,’” said Ellen Nowak, ATC vice president of regulatory and government affairs.
“You asked us to build a four-bedroom house – you’re getting a four-bedroom house and you’re going to pay for the whole house.”
A Microsoft spokesperson told the Journal Sentinel the tech company “remains committed to paying the costs our data center operations require while protecting other ratepayers.”
Regulators previously approved separate electric rate for data centers
In April, the state Public Service Commission modified and approved a separate electric rate for data centers in We Energies’ service area, including the Mount Pleasant project. It’s intended to ensure data centers pay for billions of dollars in new infrastructure needed to serve them.
But unlike new power plants, transmission projects built by ATC are not covered by the data center rate. Commissioners warned that if these costs are not accounted for, they could end up on residents’ energy bills.
We Energies said in April it was working with ATC on a plan to address transmission costs.
Consumer advocates have warned about the cost of the transmission lines throughout the process. They include the Citizens Utility Board of Wisconsin, which represents residents in utility cases.
“Without the large and loud engagement on this topic, I doubt we would have seen the movement we have from the applicant and ATC to evaluate creative solutions to this issue,” Commissioner Marcus Hawkins said in April.
CUB executive director Tom Content said the group will review ATC’s proposal “with an eye toward shielding data center-linked costs from the power bills paid by the residential and small business customers we represent.”
“This proposal goes to the heart of a key issue for CUB, ensuring customers aren’t left holding the bag for billions of costs for new power lines ATC has asked to build to serve them,” Content said. “We had expressed concern in the data center tariff case about how transmission costs were to be allocated and the PSC responded by revamping the original We Energies proposal.”
More data center plans coming, power line company says
ATC says plans for the Port Washington and Beaver Dam data centers will be filed separately.
Meanwhile, the Public Service Commission is ordering retail utilities create a uniform electric rate for all their large data center customers. Commissioners say this will increase transparency and ensure fairness in future projects.
But ATC says agreements for individual projects are in line with its past filings as well as data center plans enacted by transmission owners in other states. The rules for wholesalers like ATC are different, the company added.
“That’s not atypical for us,” Nowak said. “Our agreements are going to be very similar among all of our customers. It's just going to be different inputs, and we have to treat all of our customers similarly and equally.”
In March, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft and other tech giants signed a White House agreement promising to cover all costs associated with their data center build-outs. The Trump administration expanded the nonbinding pledge in July as it seeks to promote AI development.
Meanwhile, data centers are facing growing public backlash. Marquette University Law School's July poll found that three quarters of Wisconsin voters viewed data centers unfavorably, up from 55% in October.
CUB will be watching for future agreements for the other data center campuses, Content said.
“It's critical to ensure data center developers are paying their full share for the costs needed to serve them, including ‘network upgrades’ that tech companies committed to funding when they signed the Ratepayer Protection Pledge this spring at the White House,” he said.
Cost recovery rules add urgency
Retail utilities like We Energies cannot pass along the cost of a new power plant until it comes online, years after initial approval. But a regulatory exception allows ATC to charge customers for projects that are still under construction.
The new transmission projects for Microsoft’s campus have already been approved by state regulators, totaling $625 million. Two more substations initially built for Foxconn will serve the project and be covered by ATC’s July 16 plan.
A $1.5 billion high-voltage power line for the Port Washington data center is also pending commission approval.
The cost recovery rule means customer protections must be put in place soon, before new projects make their way into electric rates, consumer advocates warn.
We Energies earmarked $620 million in transmission charges for data centers in 2027 and 2028, according to its energy rate plan. State regulators will likely vote on approval of the plan by the end of 2026.
Both the state Public Service Commission and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission must sign off on ATC's plan. It has been sent to the regional grid operator for review, the company says. It’s expected to come before federal regulators by early August.
Once it’s filed, the federal agency will have 60 days to respond.
Francesca Pica can be reached at fpica@usatodayco.com.
Clergy Gone Wild: Pastor Explains Why He Hid Sex Offender Volunteering at Church
Thursday, July 23, 2026
'It is musty': Racine residents fed up with odor, bad taste in tap water
Wednesday, July 22, 2026
Cops Gone Wild: Racine DA reviewing two officers for alleged misuse of Flock
David Clarey
Four Racine-area law enforcement officers have been evaluated for criminal charges due to alleged misuse of a controversial license plate reading technology.
Racine County District Attorney Patricia Hanson told the Journal Sentinel her office had reviewed possible charges against two Racine Police Department officers and two Racine County Sheriff's Office deputies, with two of those reviews ongoing and two closed with her not issuing charges. The reviews stem from allegations of misuse of the license plate tracking system known as Flock, which has drawn criticism from activists and residents in some Wisconsin cities.
Hanson provided records that offer some detail on the two she elected not to issue charges against.
In one case, a Racine County Sheriff's Office investigator believed his partner "feared immediate harm from her ex-husband," and he used a Flock database to search for the ex-husband. Then he provided the Flock reports to another law enforcement agency in another jurisdiction.
She also wrote it was not unreasonable the investigator would access the Flock database for an investigation into criminal conduct for another jurisdiction.
"I cannot see that he used the information to harass or intimidate the subject of the searches," Hanson wrote.
That investigation was not initiated by a police referral, as is typical in prosecutor reviews of potential criminal charges. Instead, it came from what's known as a John Doe investigation, which can be requested by a member of the public as a way to investigate possible criminal charges.
The John Doe case was filed in March and led Walworth County Judge Kristine Drettwan to order Hanson's office to review potential charges April 13. Hanson declined charges June 1. The case remains open, according to online court records.
Hanson also declined to press charges against a police officer who accessed Flock five times to track his own vehicle, according to a disposition note. There were problems between the officer and a co-owner over payment for the vehicle and, on one occasion, it had been towed while the co-owner had used it.
Hanson, who received the referral in June, said the matter was best handled internally by Racine police and did not reach the level of a crime, because of the limited number of uses and because it was on his own vehicle.
"The co-owner was aware of the FLOCK use and is not afraid of [the officer]," Hanson's document reads.
The Journal Sentinel is not naming either officer, because they were not charged with a crime.
Those details come a week after Racine police confirmed two members were under investigation for allegations of misuse of Flock. A spokesperson for the department previously declined to say whether any other officers had previously been reviewed for misuse. The spokesperson did not immediately respond to a question clarifying if the officer Hanson declined to issue charges against is one of the two active investigations.
Lt. Michael Luell said July 21 it had internally disciplined the investigator from the incident that Hanson declined to issue charges against. He said the sheriff's office member Hanson is reviewing was investigated by an outside agency, before the criminal referral.
Elsewhere in Wisconsin, including Milwaukee, police have faced discipline for misusing Flock. In some cases, criminal charges have been filed.
In Milwaukee, prosecutors have charged two police officers after investigations into potential misuse. In one case, a former Milwaukee police officer was sentenced to 12 months of probation and a $500 fine after he tracked an ex-girlfriend and her partner.
More recently, a detective tasked with investigating officer misconduct was charged with a felony after investigators alleged he improperly used the system, GPS tracked the vehicle of someone and accessed case files related to the person. That detective, Tehrangi Chapman, had investigated the former police officer who later pleaded guilty to misusing the system, authorities said in a court document.
Officers' misuse of Flock, or allegations of it, have occurred in Menasha as well.
David Clarey is a public safety reporter at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. He can be reached at dclarey@usatoday.com.
Tuesday, July 21, 2026
Sturtevant woman arrested on child pornography charges
Milana Doné
RACINE — An 18-year-old Sturtevant woman has been arrested following an investigation of a tip about an individual possessing and advertising child sexual abuse material.
Jocelyn Harris was charged with five counts of possession of child pornography by a person under the age of 18.
Earlier this year, an investigator with the Racine County Sheriff's Office Internet Crimes Against Children Unit received a tip from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children regarding an individual possessing and advertising child sexual abuse material.
The tip included five videos uploaded through Snapchat and a related Twitter post, all which contained child sexual abuse videos.
The Twitter post contained a link to Telegram, a message and file-sharing platform that allows content to be placed behind a paywall. It is frequently used by offenders attempting to avoid law enforcement, according to RCSO.
Harris was identified as a suspect and investigators executed a search warrant at her residence. She was arrested and investigators seized multiple electronic devices.
According to RCSO, Harris admitted to owning and operating the Snapchat and Twitter accounts during an interview and reportedly claimed the material was simply "popping up" on her accounts.
Harris initially appeared in court July 10, where her cash bond was set at $5,000.
A preliminary hearing is scheduled for July 23.
Posts
