Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,
When historians and analysts look at the factors surrounding
the collapse of a society, they often focus on the larger events and
indicators — the moments of infamy. However, I think it’s
important to consider the reality that large scale societal decline is
built upon a mixture of elements, prominent as well as small. Collapse
is a process, not a singular event. It happens over time, not overnight.
It is a spectrum of moments and terrible choices, set in motion in most
cases by people in positions of power, but helped along by useful
idiots among the masses. The decline of a nation or civilization
requires the complicity of a host of saboteurs.
So, instead of focusing on the top down approach, which is
rather common, let’s start from the foundations of our culture to better
understand why there is clear and definable destabilization.
Declining Moral Compass
There is always a conflict between personal gain and personal
conscience — this is the nature of being human. But in a stable society,
these two things tend to balance out. Not so during societal decline,
as personal gain (and even personal comfort and gratification) tends to
greatly outweigh the checks and balances of moral principles.
People often mistake the term “morality” to be a religious creation,
but this is not what I am necessarily referring to. The concepts of
“good” and “evil” are archetypal — that is to say they are
psychologically inherent in most human beings from the moment of birth.
This is not a matter of faith, but a matter of fact, observed by those
in the field of psychology and anthropology over the course of a century
of study. How we relate to these concepts can be affected by our
environment and upbringing, but for the most part, our moral compass is
psychologically ingrained. It is up to us to either follow it or not
follow it.
Watching how people handle this choice is a bit of hobby of mine, and
I do take notes. You can learn a lot about the state of your
environment by observing what people around you tend to do when faced
with the conflict of personal gain versus personal conscience. It is
saddening to admit that even though I live in rural America, where you
are more likely to find self-reliance and cultural stability, I can
still see a faltering nation bleeding through.
I have seen supposedly good people act dishonestly in business
agreements. I have seen local institutions scam hardworking citizens. I
have seen a court system rife with bias and a “good old boy” attitude of
favoritism. I have seen local companies pretend to be benevolent
contributors to the community while at the same time running constant
frauds and rackets. I have even seen a few people within the liberty
movement itself put the movement at risk with their own avarice,
gluttony, narcissism and sociopathy.
Again, it is important to make a note of such people and
institutions, for as the system continues its downward spiral it is
these people that will present the greatest threat to the innocent.
As Carl Jung notes in his book
The Undiscovered Self, there
is always a contingent of latent sociopaths and psychopaths within any
culture; usually about 10% of the population. In normal times, they, at
least most of them, are forced into moral acclimation by the rest of the
populace. But in times of decline, they seem to leak out of the
woodwork like a slimy fungus. During heightened collapse, they no longer
have to pretend to be upstanding and they show their true colors.
Most dangerous is when latent sociopaths or full blown sociopaths
assume roles of leadership or power during the worst of times. With
everyone distracted by their own plight, these people can become a
cancer, infecting everything with their narcissistic pursuits and
causing destruction in their wake.
Disinterest In Rewarding Conscience
During wider cultural collapse, it can become “fashionable” to see
acts of principle as something to be scoffed at or ridiculed or to even
see them as threats to the status quo. The concept of “going along to
get along” takes precedence over doing what is right even when it is
hard; this attitude is not relegated to the less honest people within
society.
As a system collapses, a fog of apathy can result. Good people can
become passive, scrambling to their individual corner of the world and
hoping evil times will simply pass them by. The phrase “I just want to
put all this behind me” is spoken regularly; but as we ignore the
trespasses of terrible men and women, we also enable them. How? Because
by doing nothing we allow them to continue their criminality, and we
subject future persons and generations to victimization.
When doing the right thing is treated as laughable or “crazy” by what
seems like a majority in the midst of widespread corruption, you are
truly in the middle of a great decline.
In Christian circles, the idea of “the remnant” is sometimes spoken
of. In Christian terms, this usually represents a minority of true
believers surviving a tumultuous and immoral era. I see “the remnant”
not so much as a contingent of Christians alone, but as a contingent of
people that continue to maintain their principles and conscience when
faced with unprecedented adversity. In the worst of times, these people
remain stalwart, even if they are ridiculed for it.
Disinterest In Independent Effort
It is said that in this world there are two kinds of people — leaders
and followers. I’m not so sure about that, but I can see why this
philosophy is promoted; it helps evil people in power stay in power by
encouraging passive acceptance.
I would say that there are in fact two kinds of people in this world —
people who want to control others and the people that just want to be
left alone. In life sometimes we are both leaders and followers; we just
have to be sure that when we lead we lead by example and not by force,
and when we follow, we follow someone worth a damn.
In any case, passivity is not a solution to determining our roles in
society. In most situations, independent action is required by every
person to make the world a better place. Yet, in an era of systemic
crisis, it is usually independent effort that is the first thing to go
out the window. Millions upon millions of people wait around for
someone, anyone, to tell them what they should be doing and how they
should be doing it. In this way, society finds itself in stasis, frozen
in a position of inaction. Poisonous collectivism wins through mass
aggression, but also through mass passivity.
In fact, when individualists do take action they can be admonished
for it during times of societal breakdown, even if their actions have
the potential to solve a problem. The idea that one man or woman (or a
small group of people) could do anything about anything is sneered at as
“fantasy” or “delusion.” But mass movements of citizens working
towards a practical goal are rare, and even more rare is when these
movements are not controlled or manipulated to benefit the established
order. It is not mass movements that change the world for the better,
but individual people and small organizations of the dedicated, acting
without permission and without administration.
It is these individuals and small groups that, over time and through
relentless effort, inspire a majority to do what is necessary and right.
It is these people that inspire others to finally take leadership in
their own lives.
Individual Self-Isolation
I write often on the plight of the individual and individual rights
within society, and I continue to see the factor of the individual as
the most important element in any culture. A culture based on protecting
and nurturing individualism and voluntarism is the only culture, in my
view, that will ever be successful at avoiding full spectrum collapse.
That said, the downside to overt individualism is the danger of self
isolation. That is to say, when true individuals only concern themselves
with their personal circumstances and ignore the circumstances of the
rest of the world, they eventually set themselves up to be crushed by
that world.
Organization on a voluntary basis is not only healthy but vital in
the longevity of a society. The more people turn in on themselves and
only care about their own general conditions, the easier it is for evil
people to do evil things unnoticed. Also, self isolation in the wake of
collapse sets individuals up for failure, as no one is capable of
surviving without at least some help from a wider pool of knowledge and
talents.
In a system based on corruption, the establishment will encourage
self isolation as a means to control the populace. Or, they will offer a
false choice, between self isolation versus mindless collectivism. The
truth is there is always a middle ground. Voluntary organization and
individualism are not mutually exclusive. I call this the “difference
between community and collectivism.” A community does not supplant the
individual, while a collective requires the complete erasure of
individual pursuits and thought.
If you find yourself surrounded by people who refuse any
organization, even practical and voluntary organization in the face of
instability, then your society may be in the latter stages of a
collapse.
Disaster Denial
Even as a crisis or collapse unfolds, if a society actually reels or
reacts to it and takes note of the problem, there is hope for that
society. If, however, that society willfully ignores the danger and
denies it exists when presented with overwhelming evidence, then that
society will likely suffer complete disintegration and will probably
have to start all over from scratch — hopefully with a set of principles
and ideals based on conscience and honor.
The strength of a culture can be measured by its willingness to self
reflect. Its survival can be determined by its willingness to accept its
flaws when they arise and its willingness to repair the damage done.
Self-aware societies are difficult to corrupt or control. Only in denial
can people be easily manipulated and enslaved.
If you cannot accept the reality of the abyss, you cannot move to
avoid it or prepare yourself to survive the fall. I see this issue as
perhaps the single most important element in the fight to save the
portions of our society worth saving. Educating people on the blatant
facts behind our own national decline can dissolve the wall of denial,
and perhaps we will find when disaster strikes that there are far more
awake and aware individuals ready to act than we originally thought.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-05/how-recognize-when-your-society-suffering-dramatic-decline