14th Amendment Citizens

The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was adopted 
on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. 
 
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to 
the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the 
State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law 
which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the 
United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, 
liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any 
person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. 
 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv 
 
Does not a State of war between Sovereigns exist if I refuse to be 
Subject to United States? 
 
What if I claim that my Birth Right is superior to the claim of United States? 
 
The14th Amendment was ratified after the War Between the States - and 
as Lysander Spooner so aptly notes: 
 
The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no 
authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and 
man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between 
persons now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract 
between persons living eighty years ago. And it can be supposed to 
have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to 
years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and 
obligatory contracts. Furthermore, we know, historically, that only a 
small portion even of the people then existing were consulted on the 
subject, or asked, or permitted to express either their consent or 
dissent in any formal manner. Those persons, if any, who did give 
their consent formally, are all dead now. Most of them have been dead 
forty, fifty, sixty, or seventy years. And the constitution, so far as 
it was their contract, died with them. They had no natural power or 
right to make it obligatory upon their children. It is not only 
plainly impossible, in the nature of things, that they could bind 
their posterity, but they did not even attempt to bind them. That is 
to say, the instrument does not purport to be an agreement between any 
body but “the people” then existing; nor does it, either expressly or 
impliedly, assert any right, power, or disposition, on their part, to 
bind anybody but themselves. Let us see. Its language is: 
 
    “We, the people of the United States (that is, the people then 
existing in the United States), in order to form a more perfect union, 
insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote 
the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves 
and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the 
United States of America.” 
 
http://praxeology.net/LS-NT-6.htm 
 
When Congress once again resumes it's responsibilities - in regards to 
MONEY - and abolishes the Federal Reserve and FIAT money - then I 
shall re-consider being subject to United States. 
 
U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 10 
 
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; 
grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of 
Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of 
Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing 
the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. 
 
https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1ec10.html
 
Read in conjunction with the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, and the 
obligation-of-contracts clause (Art. I, sec. 10, cl. 1), we can 
identify five monetary policies that are constitutionally requisite in 
the United States: 
 
    The basic unit is the dollar, a silver coin containing 371.25 
grains of pure silver. 
    Only gold or silver coins, or currency backed by the same, are legal tender. 
    No state may issue coins or currency. 
    No one may counterfeit U.S-government-issued coins or currency. 
    Fiat money is forbidden. 
 
https://deanclancy.com/the-constitutions-seven-money-clauses/ 
 
Until then - United States is a rogue and foreign government which has 
usurped the original Founders intent and contract. Thus any 
contractual obligation or legal proceedings are null and void. 
 
There exists within United States a subversive and dangerous foreign 
enemy which has subverted the Constitution and allowed a private 
Central Bank - the Federal Reserve - to usurp Congress and grant the 
Federal Reserve the power to control and create money. 
 
When simple possession of money ceases to be evidence of debt and 
created out of thin air - then I may choose to contract with United 
States. OR - NOT.