Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Don't expect a face mask requirement or statewide bar closures in Wisconsin, here's why

From JSOnline:

Molly Beck
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel



MADISON - The coronavirus is showing signs of acceleration in Wisconsin but unlike states experiencing a resurgence, Gov. Tony Evers likely won't be mandating face masks or issuing orders to close bars — both tools other governors are using to prevent new outbreaks. 
Because of a state Supreme Court decision in May that struck down much of the governor's stay-at-home order, Evers says his administration no longer has the sole authority to issue statewide mandates aimed at curbing the spread of the virus.
But whether Evers can or can't take such actions is under debate. 
Legal experts don't all agree that the Supreme Court ruling prevents the governor from shutting down bars if virus cases skyrocket, or requiring masks like governors in Kansas, Michigan, Illinois and California have mandated
"The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision in (Legislature v. Palm) expressly stated that it was not ruling on the governor’s powers. As a matter of precedent, that means that (the ruling) does not foreclose the governor from issuing an order mandating masks or closing certain businesses," said University of Wisconsin Law School professor Miriam Seifter, who specializes in executive power and the separation of powers at the state and federal levels.

The state Supreme Court’s decision striking down the stay-at-home order was focused on how much power Evers’ health secretary had after the expiration of an emergency declaration that Evers had issued.

Man rescued after being stuck on cliffside while climbing at Cliffside Park

From The Journal Times.com:


Dillion Armstrong stands covered in mud after Deputy Jared Kroll of the Racine County Sheriff’s Office rescued him. Armstrong's right leg was stuck in a muddy hole at Cliffside Park and he was unable to move.

CALEDONIA — Racine County Sheriff's Office saved a young man whose leg was stuck in a "muddy hole" on the side of a cliff at Cliffside Park.

Tuesday at around 9:30 a.m., Racine County Sheriff’s Office was dispatched to a 911 hang up call of a man stuck on a cliff at Cliffside Park, 7320 Michna Road, according to a press release issued by the Sheriff's Office.

Racine County Communications said the 911 call had disconnected and that the caller had advised his phone was dying.

Racine County Sheriff’s Office Patrol Deputies and Water Patrol Deputies responded to the area. The training division, which was on a separate assignment, overheard the call and responded with a sergeant and two deputies.


An intensive search was conducted by responding personnel. Just after 10 a.m. Racine County Sheriff’s Office Training Division Deputies located Dillon Armstrong stuck on the side a cliff.

Armstrong was approximately seven feet below the top of the clay cliff. The cliff was significantly eroded and was at an approximate 45-degree slope. Armstrong’s right leg was stuck in a muddy hole up to his thigh and he was unable to move.

From his position, he was not visible from the water or top of the cliff.

Deputy Jared Kroll climbed down the cliff with the help of a squad issued throw rope. Kroll dug Armstrong out of the hole and brought him to the top of the cliff.

"We are happy to report there were no injuries sustained in this rescue," the press release stated.

From: https://journaltimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/man-rescued-after-being-stuck-on-cliffside-while-climbing-at-cliffside-park-rescued/article_b27b5ebb-fe48-5595-a021-1ddcdeb834b8.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1

Secret Weidner v. Racine case continues through court, could be resolved in October

From The Journal Times.com:


KENOSHA — The open records case involving former Racine alderman Sandy Weidner is continuing to make its way through court - now in Kenosha County Circuit Court.

Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Chad G. Kerkman with Weidner's attorney Mark Hinkston and attorney Michael Cohen, representing the City of Racine, set a briefing and hearing schedule for the remainder of the case that could see the case resolved by early October.

In the first hearing since the Wisconsin Court of Appeals' decision on the case, the attorney representing the city, Michael Cohen, asked to be able to give a Powerpoint presentation on the communications involved and the city's argument that they fall under attorney-client privilege.

He said he plans to also file a motion for the Powerpoint and the presentation to be sealed. Kerkman set a deadline for July 7 to submit the Powerpoint to the court and to present by Aug. 3.

After giving time for Hinkston to respond and then Cohen to respond to Hinkston's response, a hearing is scheduled for 9 a.m. on Oct. 7, where Kerkman plans to issue a decision in the case.

Revolving judges

Kerkman is the fourth judge assigned the case after the Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruled that an amended petition Weidner filed in February 2018, previously rejected by Racine County Circuit Court Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, should have been allowed. 

Weidner filed a request to substitute judges when the case was returned to Gasiorkiewicz, who has presided over the case since it was filed on Nov. 29, 2017. The case was then assigned to Racine Circuit Court Judge Michael Piontek on April 30. On May 4, another request on the city’s behalf asked for another substitution.

The case was then sent to Racine County Circuit Court Judge Maureen Martinez on May 5. On May 20, the order for an out-of-county judge was made after it was determined that Martinez “knows or has familiarity with the parties,” the court record states.

How it all began

The civil suit stems from a closed-session meeting in fall 2017, during which Racine City Attorney Scott Letteney showed City Council members a collection of emails that Weidner and two other aldermen had sent to constituents that Letteney thought violated attorney-client privilege.

The emails included correspondence about subjects ranging from the city’s Redevelopment Authority to a case involving a bar’s liquor license. It also included an email sent to a former Journal Times reporter about scheduling for a public meeting, a PowerPoint presentation reportedly given at a public meeting and details about development projects, including the abandoned arena project.

Letteney said he was going to send the emails to the city’s Ethics Board for review. When Weidner requested a copy of the emails, she was denied. She filed a lawsuit shortly after demanding the records.

Gasiorkiewicz sealed case details from public view, something he said was requested by Cohen on behalf of the City before the first hearing.

Weidner spoke to the news media in August 2018 about the case. Due to the case’s seal, she was found guilty of civil contempt of court. Weidner’s attorneys filed a challenge to unseal the case, as well as to the contempt of court conviction, with the Court of Appeals.

In January 2019, the majority of the documents in Weidner’s open-records case were made public — with some redaction.

As of May 1, the City of Racine had already spent more than $129,000 to litigate the open records court case brought by Weidner.

From: https://journaltimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/secret-weidner-v-racine-case-continues-through-court-could-be-resolved-in-october/article_d43eec1b-a655-50f0-acfc-a7b9167074a2.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1

Antarctica's South Pole warming at three times the rate of rest of world, study finds

GPS III Space Vehicle 03 Mission

Race for coronavirus vaccine accelerates as cases rise l GMA

Federal Reserve: How creating money could save US economy

White House says Trump was not told about alleged Russian bounties



I don't like to read, either.  That's why I post so many videos.

Army investigates disappearance of Fort Hood soldier

Live: Fauci, CDC Chief Testify On Coronavirus Response | NBC News

White House to brief Democrats as both sides press for answers on alleged Russian bounties

Sarah Sanders lays out key differences between Trump, Biden in 2020

EU excludes US citizens from visiting amid pandemic

Hollywood entertainer Carl Reiner dies at 98

Racine lawsuit is a test case for how much power local officials have to control the spread of coronavirus

From JSOnline:

Patrick MarleyMilwaukee Journal Sentinel

Six weeks after the Wisconsin Supreme Court threw out the state’s stay-at-home order, city and county officials are learning they may have little ability to control the spread of the coronavirus.
A lawsuit in Racine could determine how much power local officials have to close bars and gyms and take other steps to try to contain the pandemic. The lawsuit — which has gone abysmally for Racine officials in its initial stages — comes as health officials raise concerns about an increase in cases.
The Supreme Court in May issued a 4-3 decision that tossed out a statewide stay-at-home order issued by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. The lawsuit was brought by Republican lawmakers, who argued they should have a say in any state rules meant to contain the virus.

After winning the case, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos of Rochester and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald of Juneau said they didn’t think any state rules were needed. Local officials could handle the illness by putting in place their own rules, they argued.

Indeed, in the hours after the Supreme Court issued its decision, several communities imposed their own orders, many of them mirroring the ones written by the Evers administration.

City COVID order back in court Tuesday to schedule remaining court hearings

From The Journal Times.com:


RACINE — The lawsuit that has halted the city’s COVID-19 restrictions for businesses is to go before Racine County Circuit Court Judge Jon Fredrickson today to schedule the remainder of the case.
Fredrickson struck down the city’s attempts to keep said restrictions in place twice in less than a week.
The City of Racine, and Harbor Park Crossfit owners David and Corian Yandel, are scheduled to appear in court at 11 a.m. to hammer out the briefing and hearing schedule for the case. Both parties had until 5 p.m. Monday to submit briefs ahead of the hearing.
Because of COVID-19 restrictions, the hearing will be held via a Zoom conference. The public can view the proceedings on the Racine County Circuit Court Branch 7’s Youtube channel which will live stream the hearing.

CDC Official: This Is Just The Beginning of America's New Coronavirus Surge

ScreenshotJAMA Network/YouTube

This is just the “beginning” of a dangerous new wave of coronavirus cases that could become more deadly as it reaches an older population in the U.S., according to Dr. Anne Schuchat, Principal Deputy Director of the CDC. The U.S. has identified at least 2.59 million cases and over 126,000 deaths, the highest numbers in the world by far, with states like Florida, Texas, Arizona, California, and others experiencing record numbers of new cases each day.
The troubling assessment was made by Dr. Schuchat during an interview with Dr. Howard Bauchner from the Journal of the American Medical Association that was livestreamed Monday on YouTube.
“What we have in the United States is hard to describe because it’s so many different outbreaks,” Schuchat said, stressing that dwindling hospital bed capacity in places like Texas was concerning and that “no one” wanted to see a repeat of what happened in New York. Some parts of Texas have already run out of room for ICU patients with covid-19.
Schuchat acknowledged the death rate for the virus has been lower over the past week because younger people are getting the disease, but that could change quickly as healthier people pass it on to populations that are more vulnerable.
“I think there was a lot of wishful thinking around the country that, ‘Hey it’s summer. Everything’s going to be fine. We’re over this.’ And we are not even beginning to be over this. There is a lot of worrisome factors about the last week or so. These increases are in many places,” Schuchat said.

'We are getting clobbered': Six months into COVID-19, doctors fear what comes next

COVID-19 plus the flu could quickly overwhelm health care systems.

Intensive care nurses work on a COVID-19 patient in the ICU at Martin Luther King Jr. Community Hospital in Los Angeles County, Calif., on May 8.Francine Orr / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images file

Six months. That's all it took for a new virus to circle the globe and infect more than 10 million people, including 2.5 million in the U.S.
That period of time could have been enough to slow or even stop the spread of COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus. Some countries, such as New Zealand, have succeeded so far.
But six months since the first report of a new virus emerging in Wuhan, China, on Dec. 31, the U.S. and other countries worldwide are experiencing surges in new cases.
On Monday, the World Health Organization marked the six months since a cluster of cases of a mysterious pneumonia in China was reported with a warning that the pandemic is "actually speeding up."
"We all want this to be over. We all want to get on with our lives," WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in his opening statement. "But the hard reality is: This is not even close to being over."
The aggressive spread of the coronavirus in the U.S., particularly in the Southern and Western states, is a reality many American health care providers face with humility and disgust as they look toward the second half of 2020. The physicians and public health experts who were interviewed hesitated when asked whether they had hope that the U.S. could overcome COVID-19 over the next six months.
"I'm discouraged and demoralized," said Dr. Michael Saag, associate dean for global health at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. "When you compare our case numbers to almost any other industrialized country, we are getting clobbered."

Coronavirus: Survivors 'at risk of PTSD'


People who were seriously ill in hospital with coronavirus need to be urgently screened for post-traumatic stress disorder, leading doctors say.
The Covid Trauma Response Working Group, led by University College London and involving experts from south-east England, said those who had been in intensive care were most at risk.
The experts said regular check ups should last at least a year.
More than 100,000 people have been treated in hospital for the virus.
The experts say tens of thousands of these would have been seriously ill enough to be at risk of PTSD.
The working group highlighted research which showed 30% of patients who had suffered severe illnesses in infectious disease outbreaks in the past had gone on to develop PTSD, while depression and anxiety problems were also common.

'It was like being in hell'

Tracy is just one of many people who has been left with psychological scars from her coronavirus experience.
She was admitted to Whittington Hospital in north London in March and spent more than three weeks there - one of which was in intensive care.
"It was like being in hell. I saw people dying, people with the life being sucked from them. The staff all have masks on and all you saw was eyes - it was so lonely and frightening."
Since being discharged in April the 59-year-old has been struggling to sleep because of the thought she will die and she has constantly suffered flashbacks.
She is now receiving counselling.
"It has been really difficult. Physically I have been so tired. I'm beginning to recover, but the mental side of it is very hard to deal with.
"I have a good support network of family and friends and I'm a positive person - and I am struggling. I think there will be plenty of people who are in a similar situation, if not worse."

One rocket launch can’t unify America

Lunar eclipse will be visible in the U.S. on July 4th

Watch a flying snake slither through the air | Science News

Why Diesel Cars Are Disappearing

Video of crowd at Chase Rice concert causes backlash

Broadway shutdown extended until January due to coronavirus

Woman Says She Can’t Medically Wear a Mask



Why doesn't she state what medical condition prevents her from wearing a face mask?  And if that's the case, then why doesn't she have a note from her doctor?

Just another pig oinking at the moon . . .

Shell Takes $22 Billion Write-Down, Expecting Lower Oil and Gas Prices

The Anglo-Dutch energy giant’s action follows a similarly large write-down by BP




  • PRINT
  • TEXT
LONDON—Royal Dutch Shell PLC is writing down the value of its assets by up to $22 billion because of lower energy prices caused by the demand-sapping coronavirus pandemic.
The write-down follows one by BP PLC on a similar scale earlier this month. Lower oil and gas prices brought on by the pandemic and uncertainty over the pace of the transition to lower carbon energy have caused major oil companies to question the value of their reserves.
...Read more: https://www.wsj.com/articles/shell-takes-22-billion-write-down-expecting-lower-oil-and-gas-prices-11593504718

Racine business owners claim denial of COVID-19 relief grant after ‘Safer at Home’ protest

From Fox6Now:

RACINE -- After attending a protest in Madison, in opposition to Safer at Home orders in April, owners of a Racine business say they're being discriminated against -- planning to sue the city after not receiving COVID-19 relief grants. Denis and Dimple Navratil said they would've received $6,500 from the grants. They're now asking themselves, what was the cost of free speech?
Denis Navratil
Denis Navratil
The pandemic is been a plague on business for the owners of Dimple's in downtown Racine.
"When we had to close our store, it went 100% dry," said Denis. "That happened overnight."
Dimple Navratil
Dimple Navratil
The Navratil family estimated a 50% to 60% drop in sales compared to last year -- the reason they jumped at the chance to apply for two rounds of small business grants in April and May for COVID-19 relief.
"When they told me there wasn't enough funds, it just didn't sit well with me," said Dimple. "I knew there was something else to it."
According to Mayor Cory Mason, Racine received 357 applications totaling almost $3 million in requests. He said $900,000 was given out to less than half of those who applied.
Denis Navratil said his business was flat out denied consideration for the grants because he attended the massive "Safer at Home" protest in Madison in April.
A car drives by as protesters against the coronavirus shutdown gather in front of the State Capitol in Madison, Wisconsin, on April 24, 2020. - Gyms, hair salons and tattoo parlors had a green light to reopen in the US state of Georgia on Friday as the death toll from the coronavirus pandemic soared past 50,000 in the US. (Photo by KAMIL KRZACZYNSKI / AFP) (Photo by KAMIL KRZACZYNSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

"While the money was helpful, our main concern now is that we've been denied our First Amendment right to speak and assemble," said Denis. "That's just not right."
Mayor Mason issued this statement:
“The small business grants were given out through a competitive grant process. These were discretionary grants and no one was entitled to funding.  Between the two rounds of grants, the City received 357 applications totaling almost $3 million in requests, and we had a total of $900,000 to give out, which went to 164 businesses. That means we had funding for less than half of all the applicants. Many great City businesses didn’t get funded because there were simply not enough funds to go around. However, if an applicant was in violation of laws or city ordinance, not conforming to zoning requirements, or hadn’t paid their taxes, that applicant was less competitive.
"As Mayor, it is my duty to protect the public health of our City's residents. While I certainly support the rights of free speech and assembly, I cannot in good conscience send scarce City resources to a person or business that willingly jeopardized public health, especially when they were competing with other businesses who were not as flagrantly violating safety measures. If an applicant was openly violating the statewide "Safer at Home" order and the public health emergency under which the City was operating to help mitigate the spread of coronavirus, that applicant would compete less favorably. For instance, participating in mass gatherings outside of our community, such as a rally with a thousand or more individuals at the State Capitol, only served to put City residents at unnecessary risk, and was certainly factored into the funding determinations.  When it comes to disbursing discretionary funds aimed at helping businesses who were sacrificing to protect public health, the City is not going to reward business owners who took reckless behaviors that risked the health of our community.”
Dimple's Racine"He's being very unfair and very unjustice by using this against us," said Dimple.
Since reopening, the owners said they've followed all safety recommendations at the store, and now, they're meeting with attorneys to pursue a lawsuit against the city.
"We are talking about the right to speak and to assemble," said Denis. "I can give him a copy of the Constitution if he wants. It's right there."
It should be noted, Dimple Navratil is also a board member for the Downtown Racine Corporation. The store has been part of downtown for two decades.
FOX6 News tried to speak with Mayor Mason on camera Monday -- but he issued a statement instead.
"FOX6 News tried to speak with Mayor Mason on camera Monday -- but he issued a statement instead."  That's because Butterball didn't want them to hear him oink.  Check out the post below to see what his relatives are up to in China.

New flu virus emerges in China with 'pandemic potential'



Why does all this shit start in China?

Gov. Murphy halts indoor dining in N.J. indefinitely

What happened to Elijah McClain? Case draws new attention amid nationwide protests | Nightline

Couple pointsrching to guns at protesters marching to St. Louis mayor's house

Golden State Killer pleads guilty

See inside a Houston hospital on the front line against coronavirus

Worst of pandemic is yet to come, WHO chief warns

California sees record jump in COVID-19 cases

China passes Hong Kong security law, deepening fears for future

Congress demands answers from Trump over alleged Russian bounties

Milwaukee businesses ask city leaders to make wearing masks mandatory in restaurants, bars and other venues

From JSOnline:

Carol Deptolla
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel





A coalition of more than 70 Milwaukee businesses is calling on Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett and Common Council President Cavalier Johnson to require the wearing of masks in restaurants, bars and other businesses visited by the public.
In a letter to Barrett and Johnson, the coalition asks that customers and workers in places such as stores, theaters and museums be required to wear face coverings, as well as patrons in restaurants and bars when they are not eating or drinking.
The letter says masks would help prevent the further spread of COVID-19 and suggests that a city requirement would give teeth to businesses' own rules about the wearing of masks.  
Andrew Miller, chef and co-owner of Third Coast Provisions downtown and Merriment Social in Walker's Point, likened restaurants' situation to a dinner party at which the hosts don't know some of the guests and are left with the social awkwardness of having to explain unfamiliar house rules to them, such as the wearing of masks.
"That is alleviated a lot if it's coming from city officials and is public knowledge from the get-go," he said.
Restaurants are in the business of hospitality and want customers to be comfortable, Miller's business partner Cameron Whyte said, but he added that if masks can help lower the rate of virus transmission and protect the restaurant from having to close again because of an outbreak, "as a small business owner, that's something I can get behind."

June is almost over


Open Blog - Tuesday


Rumba with your Roomba.

Monday, June 29, 2020

Outrage grows over Russian bounties

Cory Mason and his Staff MUST Resign - NOW!

Dear City of Racine Mayor Cory Mason, Spokesperson Shannon Powell, and
Alderpersons,

I am now demanding that City of Racine Mayor Cory Mason and his entire
staff resign - for their blatant discrimination and retaliatory
political attack against Dimples. See:

"RACINE — A longtime Downtown Racine business was denied municipal
COVID relief, and Mayor Cory Mason has confirmed participation in a
Madison Safer at Home protest led to the denial of the grant.

In a statement emailed to The Journal Times on Friday, Mason wrote:
“Participating in mass gatherings outside of our community, such as
the rally that was held at the State Capitol — such large gatherings
have been linked to cases of COVID-19 around the state — and then
returning to our City, only served to put our residents at unnecessary
risk and, thus, factored into the funding consideration.”

The Navratils said they are surprised that Mason admitted the rally
attendance was a factor in the funding consideration and they are
exploring whether the denial of funding was legal and if their rights
were infringed upon.

Upon being informed of Mason’s response, the Wisconsin Institute for
Law and Liberty stated in an email: “We are greatly concerned that
Racine officials are using government programs to discriminate and
punish First Amendment protected speech. We will continue to
investigate this matter.”'

https://journaltimes.com/news/local/downtown-racine-business-denied-covid-grant-after-rally-attendance-mayor-confirms/article_71e76d58-9637-5fea-9054-cb14fc0d2e6e.html#tracking-source=home-trending
 />
It is time for Cory Mason and his entire staff to step down - there is
no place for blatant discrimination, and political retaliation by City
Government.

Let me remind the Mayor, Spokesperson and Council, that at least once
before - in the case of Thomas Holmes DBA Park 6 you pulled this same
stunt - and drove an African -American Businessman out of the City -
without ever obtaining proper jurisdiction. That is a high-tech
judicial lynching - and you even FORCED taxpayers to pay for an appeal
after you lost the first time in Circuit Court! See:

"This case is about a liquor license revocation in which the
city council acted upon a citizen complaint that was not
sworn, as required by statute. This constituted a fundamental
error that deprived the licensing committee of jurisdiction
over the matter. Therefore, the subsequent revocation of the
liquor license was invalid. We affirm the circuit court’s
order vacating the licensing committee’s decision to revoke the liquor
license".
https://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87966
 />
The racism and hate starts at Racine City Hall - what reparations to
Thomas Holmes have been made? Why is Robert Weber now Municipal Judge
and Scott Letteney City Attorney?

See: Racine County Case Number 2011CV003249 City of Racine vs. Thomas
J Holmes et al

Attorneys
Attorney name Guardian ad litem Entered
Letteney, Scott R. No 12-21-2011
Weber, Robert K No 12-21-2011
Larsen, Nicole F. No 12-21-2011

I want Robert Weber removed from the Office of Municipal Judge and
barred for life for any political Office. I want Scott Letteney
removed from the Office of City Attorney and barred for life for any
political office.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Tim & Cindy

Talking Racine Episode 180 Discussing Three Court Cases

Gun-Toting St. Louis Lawyers Defend Mansion From BLM Protesters In Viral Video

From ZeroHedge:

Update (1115ET): The St. Louis couple seen defending their mansion on Sunday have spoken publicly about what happened.
Personal injury lawyers Mark McCloskey, 63, and his wife Patricia, 61, told KMOV4 that they were having dinner with family outside their home when the BLM protesters broke through iron gates marked with "No Trespassing" and "Private Street" and "rushed" towards their home.
"A mob of at least 100 smashed through the historic wrought iron gates of Portland Place, destroying them, rushed towards my home where my family was having dinner outside and put us in fear of our lives," said Mark McCloskey.
According to police, the couple told protesters that they were on trespassing on a private street and needed to leave. Shortly after, the couple grabbed their guns after noticing several armed protesters in the crowd, shouting threats.
"This is all private property. There are no public sidewalks or public streets. We were told that we would be killed, our home burned and our dog killed. We were all alone facing an angry mob," McCloskey told News 4. -KMOV4
*  *  *
A St. Louis couple armed themselves and stood outside their mansion as a group of Black Lives Matter protesters who had broken into their gated community shuffled past while chanting.
The couple, identified as attorneys Mark and Patricia McCloskey, engaged in a shouting match with the protesters, waving what appeared to be an AR-15 rifle and a pistol (albeit employing terrible muzzle and trigger discipline and without cover).
As the Gateway Pundit's Cassandra Fairbanks notes, the BLM protesters can be clearly be seen entering a gate into the McCloskey's private community.
Following the incident people began calling for the McCloskeys to be doxed - resulting in at least one publication removing their address from a 2018 article detailing the extensive renovations they performed on the 1912 mansion.
Photo by Alise O'Brien via St. Louis Mag
Records show the McCloskeys have donated to both Republicans and Democrats over the years, including $4,000 to the Democratic party and at least $2,400 to the Trump campaign.
One of those calling for doxing the McCloskeys, 'anti-racism executive coach' Kyle Dennis, restricted his Twitter account after he himself was doxed.  
And now - watch the left try their hardest to cancel the McCloskeys for letting the protesters, who had broken into their gated community, that they would not be victims.
Meanwhile, the memes didn't take long: